Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Asunto principal
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
South Med J ; 116(5): 427-433, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37137479

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Current evidence favors plasma to be effective against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in critically ill patients in the early stages of infection. We investigated the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma in specifically late-stage (designated as after 2 weeks of hospital admission) severe COVID-19 infection. We also conducted a literature review on the late-stage use of plasma in COVID-19. METHODS: This case series examined eight COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) who met criteria for severe or life-threatening complications. Each patient received one dose (200 mL) of plasma. Clinical information was gathered in intervals of 1 day pretransfusion and 1 hour, 3 days, and 7 days posttransfusion. The primary outcome was effectiveness of plasma transfusion, measured by clinical improvement, laboratory parameters, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Eight ICU patients received plasma late in the course of COVID-19 infection, on average at 16.13 days postadmission. On the day before transfusion, the averaged initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, PaO2:FiO2 ratio, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and lymphocyte count were 6.5, 228.03, 8.63, and 1.19, respectively. Three days after plasma treatment, the group averages for the SOFA score (4.86), PaO2:FiO2 ratio (302.73), GCS (9.29), and lymphocyte count (1.75) improved. Although the mean GCS improved to 10.14 by posttransfusion day 7, the other means marginally worsened with an SOFA score of 5.43, a PaO2:FiO2 ratio of 280.44, and a lymphocyte count of 1.71. Clinical improvement was noted in six patients who were discharged from the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: This case series provides evidence that convalescent plasma may be safe and effective in late-stage, severe COVID-19 infection. Results showed clinical improvement posttransfusion as well as decreased all-cause mortality in comparison to pretransfusion predicted mortality. Randomized controlled trials are needed to conclusively determine benefits, dosage, and timing of treatment.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos , Plasma , Sueroterapia para COVID-19 , Inmunización Pasiva/efectos adversos , Inmunización Pasiva/métodos
2.
Cureus ; 14(9): e29090, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36249624

RESUMEN

COVID-19 infection has been documented to cause a wide range of symptoms including cardiac complications. We present a case of subacute cardiac tamponade in a patient infected with COVID-19 in the absence of respiratory symptoms; we also review the current literature on this rare sequela. Our patient is a 67-year-old man who presented to the hospital due to intermittent chest pain for three weeks. COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing was negative two times. He had an outpatient echocardiogram that showed a moderate pericardial effusion about a week prior to the hospital presentation. On admission, a repeat echocardiogram showed a large pericardial effusion with tamponade physiology. Pericardiocentesis did not reveal a clear etiology of the hemorrhagic effusion but four days later, the patient was found to be positive for COVID-19 infection without any clear respiratory illness. Given the absence of other etiology and negative workup, cardiac tamponade was attributed to pericardial inflammation from this virus and our patient improved with colchicine and steroids. We, therefore, advise providers to consider COVID-19 as a cause of hemorrhagic, cryptogenic cardiac tamponade despite negative COVID-19 testing. We also review 42 additional reported cases of cardiac tamponade in patients infected with COVID-19. COVID-19 can cause cardiac tamponade even in the absence of pulmonary disease. This case and literature review highlight tamponade as a rare complication of COVID-19 and should be considered in the differential of any acute deterioration in this patient population.

3.
Cureus ; 14(5): e24820, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35693369

RESUMEN

Sphingomonas paucimobilis is an aerobic, Gram-negative bacterium that is found widely in the environment and on hospital equipment. Although this organism usually causes infection in immunocompromised patients, it may cause pulmonary disease in immunocompetent patients, in rare cases. We report a case of Sphingomonas paucimobilis pneumonia complicated by empyema in an immunocompetent patient. We present a case of a 59-year-old female who was admitted for a congestive heart failure exacerbation and pneumonia. After imaging confirmed pneumonia and pleural effusion, monotherapy with levofloxacin was started. Thoracentesis revealed empyema caused by Sphingomonas paucimobilis. Despite chest tube placement, thoracoscopy with decortication was required due to continued clinical deterioration. After surgical intervention and an adjusted antibiotic regimen of cefepime, the patient clinically improved and was discharged. Upon follow-up, she had recovered completely with no residual disease. Alongside a concise review of the literature, our study highlights the importance of this infection in immunocompetent patients and advises providers to identify causes of aspiration when Sphingomonas paucimobilis empyema is diagnosed.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...